tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34675192.post5660455220335178342..comments2024-02-05T00:12:32.364-05:00Comments on Kalayna Price: Hello mister tall, dark, and terrifyingKalayna Pricehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13420169208237019578noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34675192.post-83165650326029039962010-10-15T17:20:11.687-04:002010-10-15T17:20:11.687-04:00Classic horror does tend to be funny, mostly becau...Classic horror does tend to be funny, mostly because the technology wasn't there to make truly terrifying monsters. (I think it was Nosferatu where the 'werewolf' was actually footage of a hyena in the wild.) Of course, even with today's technology, I find the monster you don't see is often more frightening than the one you do. What do you think?<br /><br />As far as Underworld and Van Helsing, I think they have horror elements--much like urban fantasy--but wouldn't actually be considered horror. <br /><br />That might actually be a good question for the blog:<br /><br />What do you think classifies a book or movie as horror?Kalayna Pricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13420169208237019578noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34675192.post-64727518852117538022010-10-15T16:01:32.785-04:002010-10-15T16:01:32.785-04:00Due to a very VERY over active imagination, the cu...Due to a very VERY over active imagination, the curse of a writer I guess ;) I don't watch too many scary movies. I like some creepy eerie kinds, not the slasher ones.<br /><br />I LOVE the classics those. Still need to see Nosferatu. Loved the original Dracula and Wolfman. Absolutely loved the Creature from the Black Lagoon!<br /><br />Other ones that I liked while not scary scary are Van Helsing, the Underworld trilogy...and probably a few others that fit in the action/sci-fi but not a whole lot of horror. Classic horror yes, because that's always good for a laugh!Jessica @ a GREAT readhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07554254368211246669noreply@blogger.com