Wednesday, April 25, 2007

One of those days

I'm having one of those days where things just aren't clicking. I know what I should be doing, I even have plenty of ideas...I just can't concentrate. So, after hours of staring at the list of projects I wasn't doing, answering most of my emails, and haunting a couple of blogs, I decided to declare it a holiday.

So today (whatever day it is) is now officially "I can't concentrate, here have an ostridge" day. Now everyone, lets go outside and play. (Or just sit there stupefied saying "what??" I think that's what this ostridge was doing.)

Thursday, April 19, 2007

New website design up (again)

The new design is up and in record time considering I finished painting the 'focus' graphic Monday and worked my way up from scratch starting there. I'm hoping too many hours staring at code is the reason my screen looks blurry and not that my colors are glaring.

While I'm thrilled to get this design up (I think I actually might not hate it tomorrow...wouldn't that be grand?) but I probably pushed all my time into it because I'm frustrated and avoiding another I'm theoretically getting paid for.

I cut the rant I just wrote because no one really needs to hear it. On the upside, I have a site redesign that I actually put effort and time into, so no longer is my site the cobbler's bare-foot child. (Hopefully...)

So, what is everyone else up to? The romantic times convention is coming up fast. I know a couple of people going, and I really wish I could, but I doubt I'll go to any cons this year. Maybe next year. Those of you who have been to the big cons before, what are they all about? Is it worthwhile to go before you're published, or are cons more about promoting books already or soon to be on the shelf?

Monday, April 16, 2007

Art Update: The process of painting "Petals"

It has been a really long time since I did an art post, so I decided to write a 'tutorial' style post on the process I used in my latest watercolor painting, Petals. To the right is an image of the final product. Like all the images in this post, click on it to see a larger version.

Watercolor is a very unforgiving medium (it is translucent, so mistakes show through the paint) so the very first thing I did was very lightly sketch a rough outline of the girl on my piece of clayboard. I then very slowly started working on the skin. The color here is actually Cadmium Red, Cad Yellow, and Lemon yellow mixed together. On my pallet this creates a disturbingly red-orange color, and I remember, years ago, thinking I couldn't possibly have mixed it correctly when my watercolor teacher told me to use those colors. On top of white paper (or clayboard, as in this case) it does make a nice peachy skin tone. I actually know no other recipe for pale skin tone with watercolors. (Because you don't use white)
To create depth to the skin, I used two brushes: one to very lightly lay down paint, and a (paint-free) wet brush to blend the paint with. The goal here is to layer on color without leaving any hard lines. I applied the most color to shadow areas and folds. The same process was also used for the skin on the hand. I left a few harder lines than I meant to on the hand, trying to differentiate fingers. (As I've mentioned before, hands are very hard.)

Now that I have the skin, the next step is to add in hair. I recently acquired some watercolor crayons, and part of the reason I decided to do this painting was to try them out. Well, really I do know better than trying out a new medium on a 'real' project, but I did it anyway. I sketched highlights and shadows into the hair with the crayons, but I didn't consider how much paint I was actually putting down. Once I added water, the hair turned into one big monotonous mess. Ideally, some of the white of the paper should show through when using watercolors, but overdoing it with the crayons really put a crimp in that plan. I scrubbed away as much of the color as a cood in some spots, but I still lost the natural clayboard highlights. Does that mean I hate the crayons and will never use them again? No. Actually, I ended up using more in the hair trying to correct my error. The crayons give me deep, strong colors that are easy to apply thickly, so I went back in and used some yellow for highlights, and some purples for my darker midtones. I then went over all of this with a light wash of brown to bring all the colors together. The effect turned out not too shabby.


Now I went back in and started adding the finer details. Color to the eyes and lips. I put in her eyebrows and better defined the shape of her nose and lips. I'm still using the two brush technique (one with paint, one with only water) but in some places I'm now leaving harder lines on one side and only blending away from the line. In the image to the right you can see where I've gone in and added even more definition to the lips and eyes. I also scrubbed out some of the darker lines in the chin and palm and added blue in the shadows of the flesh. I also went back into the hair to add deeper and darker shadows so it would fall behind the ear and neck, and to make the yellow highlights really pop.

Now, in all honesty, I probably should have been working on the background and developing it as I did the foreground...that was how I was taught in school, but *shrugs* I didn't. On the left you'll see I painted in my flower petals using reds with shadows of blue. You might also notice the small grey dots around the petals. They are made of a foul smelling substance that I believe is called masking fluid. It started as a liquid and I used a fine tiped pallet knife to drip the dots onto the clayboard. The masking fluid then dried to a rubbery substance that protected the surface under it from paint.
With the flowers and the figure painted, all that was left was the 'empty' background. Using a large flat brush full of clean water, I wet the background and then dropped color on it. The main color is blue (as you can probably tell) but it was pounded into my head that you never leave more than a few inches without a color changes, so if you pay attention, you might notice greens and purples in the mix as well. (this isn't actually a random hodpodge mix: using color theory, the areas with more green and blue (cool colors) move backward and the areas with reds and yellows (warm colors) move forward.) a high concentration of yellow s also added above the palm of her hand and around the flowers. I also rubbed away the masking fluid, revealing clean white clayboard beneath it. I added a bit of yellow to the white dots, so they would blend in a little but still glow. A little bit of the blue crawled up onto the skin and I had to scrub it alway best I could. Then I scanned it into the computer so the details would show up clearer than in the photographs. The color is also closer to true in the scan. (though the lower arm isn't quite so orange in the painting)

And that's it, the finished product. I realized after scanning it in, that I didn't give her a left shoulder, and that part of her left bicep should also be visible with the position of her arm...thats why the arm looks so out of place. Unfortunately, the painting is beyond the stage where I could fix that easily. The good news is, I can fix it digitally later as I plan to turn this painting into a web graphic to use when I redesign my site. (I actually painted it specifically for the purpose.)

I would estimate it took between nine and fifteen hours to paint "Petals", beginning to end (I'm not sure of the exact time because I wasn't paying a lot of attention. I started working on it Friday and finished today, but I didn't get much time to work on it over the weekend.) Well, that is about all I can say on this painting. I hope you found this little tutorial at least interesting if not helpful.

I wasn't going to go on to the CG tonight, but I did anyway. So here you can see I added in her shoulder and upper arm. I also smoothed some of the rougher areas and repainted the hair. The background was removed in preparation for using the image as a webgraphic so I had to add back in the glow...and frankly...I really like the glow on black. Well...that's really the end this time.

Monday, April 09, 2007

fae or fey

I find there are many different ways to spell the names of 'mythical' races/creatures. You have fae and fey, vampires and vampyres, griffin and gryphon, and fairy and faerie. (and others I'm probably forgetting.)
What I want to know is if certain spellings annoy readers. Me personally, I hate the spelling vampyre. In fact, I once passed up reading a book someone said was great just because the author favored the word and I guess I was in the mood to be easily miffed. I have no preference on fae, fey, or faeries, but I know someone who says he can't help but thinking of Disney and Tink when he reads the name fairy and he can't take the story seriously.
So what about everyone else: are certain spellings deal breakers? Do you think some spellings apply in certain situations and not during others? Opinions, anyone?